22 Dec / 2022

AI, Weak and Strong

Much is currently being written about AI (artificial intelligence), particularly ChatGTP (https://chat.openai.com/chat), a chatbot created by OpenAI. So much has been written, in fact, that I am not sure what more there is to say. For that reason, I will only make a few observations and provide a number of links to explore. (For more background on the terminology and categories of AI, here is a web page from IBM – https://www.ibm.com/cloud/learn/what-is-artificial-intelligence.)

What is ChatGPT?

ChatGTP is not the first or only use for AI. It is the first readily available “strong artificial intelligence” resource. It takes the form of a general AI, sucking in a snapshot of the information on the Internet and synthesizing it to a user’s specification. The user can ask almost any question, and ChatGPT will attempt to provide an answer, similar to chatbots like Amazon’s Alexa. Unlike Alexa, it is aware of the context of the conversation with the user, so the user can refine the results by giving further instructions in the chat. Compared to a Google search, it can produce a wider range of results. While Google can return a list of URLs or a brief summary of information, ChatGPT results can take nearly any form, including longer written works, freeform lists of ideas, and even computer programs. The potential time-saving is enormous, but it has some drawbacks. Much like Google, the process it uses to return results is opaque, and it is likely to stay that way as it is created by a for-profit company. Its results, based on a snapshot of the Internet and ChatGPT’s transformation process, can be inaccurate as well.

Other uses and forms

While the promise of an all-purpose Internet oracle or a free ghostwriter seems tantalizing, other uses for AI are also important. More specific uses, called “weak AI”, have been around for quite some time, ranging from AI that enhances photos to grammar checkers to audio transcription. I am particularly interested in those uses that save me time and typing by moving information from audio to text and back again. Newer specialized uses of “weak AI” still deserve attention as strong AI continues to be developed.

Besides ChatGPT itself, development of other tools that use strong AI are being developed. A starting point for learning about these is OpenAI’s page of examples- https://beta.openai.com/examples/. Also, a Chronicle of Higher Education article on ChatGPT (https://www.chronicle.com/article/ai-and-the-future-of-undergraduate-writing) mentions two other sites with newer AI tools, one to assist in research (https://elicit.org) and the other for creation of more AI tools (https://fermat.ws). In addition, Notion, which I have used off-and-on for note-taking and other tasks, has recently incorporated AI into its system. Below is a screenshot of an AI-generated post and a menu of AI options from Notion.

Screenshot of Notion’s AI Assist options

Here is a link to Notion’s guide to its AI facility, which has some useful information about AI in general – https://www.notion.so/help/guides/using-notion-ai. Notion’s AI Assist is in beta at the moment, so it is not readily available yet. However, Notion itself is free to college faculty (https://www.notion.so/product) and you can get on a waiting list for AI Assist. I like Notion, but it has a learning curve.

Prospects

This is early days for strong AI resources like ChatGPT and Notion’s AI Assist. There are many questions about their abilities. Their costs, too, which are much higher than Google searches, may limit availability of such services in the future. While there may be many practical benefits for this newest crop of AI, critical thinking is needed too. Students and faculty should avoid over-reliance on strong AI or overestimation of the capabilities of these new forms of mediating information. Faculty will also likely face the challenge of educating students about how and when to use this sort of resource, as they did with Wikipedia and Google. I also think we need to keep an eye on openness with such a powerful tool. (Here is an article that discusses just how open OpenAI really is and the need for openness in developing strong AI- https://theconversation.com/everyones-having-a-field-day-with-chatgpt-but-nobody-knows-how-it-actually-works-196378.)

Additional web sources on ChatGPT/AI:

Commentary about teaching writing and ChatGPT:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1V1drRG1XlWTBrEwgGqd-cCySUB12JrcoamB5i16-Ezw/edit?pli=1#heading=h.y7vlxxluoxbv (document linked in the Chronicle article)

https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2022/12/openai-chatgpt-writing-high-school-english-essay/672412/

https://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/higher-ed-gamma/ai-unleashed

https://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/just-visiting/freaking-out-about-chatgpt—part-i

https://www.wsj.com/articles/chatgpt-wrote-my-ap-english-essayand-i-passed-11671628256?mod=panda_wsj_author_alert

Other commentary about ChatGPT and newer AI:

https://www.wsj.com/articles/everyone-in-your-feed-is-talking-about-chatgpt-and-lensa-and-heres-why-11670356499?mod=djemTechThings

https://dev.to/techelevator/what-does-chatgpt-mean-for-new-software-developers-3e8a

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0uQqMxXoNVs&list=WL&index=76

https://www.technologyreview.com/2022/12/19/1065596/how-to-spot-ai-generated-text

Please follow and like us:
onpost_follow

The Electronic Frontier Federation is “dedicating to defending your rights in the digital world.”  A recent report they have compiled analyzes student privacy (K-12) — or lack thereof — in light of school-provided technology and school-required accounts with various ed-tech vendors.  In the 3-part report, they talk about the laisseInternet Privacyz-faire approach many schools take with regard to student relationships with the outside vendors, they discus the relevant laws and also make recommendations for change.

In light of recent legislation that allows ISPs to sell subscriber data, this becomes an even more interesting question.  A Wisconsin congressman, James Sensenbrenner, recently opined that this shouldn’t be a problem because “Nobody’s got to use the Internet.”  However, if I require my students to sign up with an online provider to view or participate in an educational module they make available, or to use a tool that they supply, they don’t really have a choice… and are probably also quite unaware of the potential consequences.

What do you think?  How can we better protect student’s privacy as we’re required to do by FERPA?  How can we better educate students about their own rights and responsibilities in this matter?

Please follow and like us:
onpost_follow

ELI is the Educause Learning Initiative, and Educause is a nonprofit association whose mission is to advance higher education through the use of information technology.  So when ELI publishes the results of a survey about Key Issues in Teaching and Learning, you know the items identified will all be technology-related.  Nonetheless, it’s an interesting list, and their historical list on which you can see the movement of items across the years in terms of priority by surveyees, is even more interesting.

My own major frustration continues to be in the extremely uneven and very basic misunderstandings, lack of knowledge and lack of ability that my students when it comes to using computers.  They consider themselves exceptionally proficient, but are quickly out of their depth when faced with a different machine, a different network, a different application or operating system.  And their troubleshooting skills are generally very poor.  I don’t think that fits on this list, but I sure wish someone would begin to consider the critical importance of RELIABLY being able to use a computer in this day and age!

Please follow and like us:
onpost_follow

Welcome back, everybody!  First day of classes — go get ’em!   We talk a lot about learning styles and using technology to facilitate individualized learning.  This article has some interesting observations about that, as well as about why programming machines to be ‘experts’ is still a long way off — because most human experts do what they do without really knowing they’re doing it!

Somehow, that makes me feel better about how I expect today to go…!

Please follow and like us:
onpost_follow